Canada, the best performing among the G7 economies, is officially in recession and there will no growth in 2009, the country's top bank has said in a new report.
The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), the country's number one bank, said the US downturn and credit squeeze have led Canada's economy into recession.
The economy will grow by 0.6 percent in 2008 and post no growth in 2009, the report released Friday said.
Craig Wright, senior vice-president and chief economist at the RBC, said the US economy has fallen into a deep recession, dragging the Canadian economy along.
"However, we expect the slowdown in Canada not to be as severe as in other countries since the imbalances plaguing other countries are more pronounced. We expect to see a moderate, though sustained, recovery in the second half of 2009," he said.
After six years of solid gain, the report said, falling commodity prices will cut domestic income that has supported consumer, business and government spending for the past several years.
The outlook for 2009 is very bleak as the combination of falling domestic income, credit squeeze, and a rising debt-to-asset ratio will curb consumer spending, it said.
The bank said though negative growth is only expected to last the next two quarters, its impact will be far reaching, with the unemployment rate climbing to 7.4 percent in 2009.
On the economic deterioration in the US which accounts for more than 85 percent of Canada's global trade, the report said the real GDP in America will decline by 1.5 percent in 2009 because of slower export growth and weakening in global economic activity.
Though the Bank of Canada has reduced the overnight rate to 1.5 percent to stimulate the economy, the report expects the rate to be further reduced to one percent as the economy enters the weakest period for growth.
Recession, zero growth next year
by alex | 10:01 AM in BMO, Canada's economy, Canadian mortgage, Montreal mortgage, Recession, royal bank of canada, zero growth | comments (0)
New Housing Construction
by alex | 11:26 AM in Canada mortgage, montreal housing market, new housing, rising prices, row housing, semi-detached house, single family house | comments (0)
Construction of new housing in Ottawa fell 36 per cent in November, led by big declines in townhouse units, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. said Monday.
Despite the big decline, housing starts are still running 7.7 per cent ahead of last year as builders put shovels in the ground for developments that were sold earlier in the year before sales of new units plunged this fall..
CMHC said that construction started on 492 units during the month, down from 769 units a year earlier. The big decline followed an unusually strong October in which Ottawa bucked a national decline in starts triggered by economic problems.
The number of new row housing units fell 61 per cent 108 units and single-family starts declined 31 per cent 266 units.
The declines were partly offset by increased construction of semi-detached and apartment units.
Despite a significandt decline in single-family housing starts to 266 units from 386 units a year earlier, it was still the single biggest generator of housing construction during November — a testamant to the fact that despite rising prices, buying a single-family unit is still more affordable here than in most big Canadian cities.
Sandra Perez Torres, senior Market Analyst at CMHC, said in a statement: “Single-detached construction is a better barometer of the health of the new construction market. After exceptional new construction activity in October, single detached construction still represented over half of total construction in November.
"Total housing foundations for this type of dwelling remained at a very high level, just marginally lower than last year’s numbers”, she said.
Canada Mortgage loan- tax deductable?
by alex | 6:54 AM in best mortgage rate in Montreal, home mortgage loan, mortgage brokers canada, refinancing mortgage | comments (0)
Canadian homeowners are green with envy over the fact our neighbours to the south are allowed to deduct the interest paid on their mortgages from their taxes. Is it possible to do the same thing here?
I received an elegant little flyer in my mailbox the other day. It was a small glossy fold-over, and it had a quality look and feel to it. The only text on the front flap of the flyer asked me a provocative question: "Is your mortgage tax deductible?" The inside of the flyer told me that I could learn how to collect tax refunds from my mortgage loan. "Canadian homeowners are entitled to collect Tax Refunds from their mortgage payments under Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) guidelines for 'Cash Damming'.
By following CRA's specific guidelines for borrowing and investing, you will claim thousands of dollars in Tax Refunds every year from your mortgage." The small flyer mentioned "Tax Refund" five more times, and twice pointed out that I could use my Tax Refund to pay off my mortgage faster. That's pretty exciting,
The biggest single expense of many Canadian families is their mortgage payment, and we've all been making those mortgage payments with after-tax dollars. Many a Canadian has looked across the border in envy at the tax deductibility that Americans enjoy on their home mortgage interest. If it turns out that we can be getting Tax Refunds from our mortgage payments too, well, that's just a no-brainer.
As it happens, I am quite familiar with this topic and strategy, so I can spare you the inconvenience of having to leave the comfort of your home to discover how this works. In fact, I'm going to provide you with all the essential information that you really must know about Canadian mortgage deductibility and Tax Refunds, all in the very next paragraph! How can I possibly do that? By using an enhanced information conveyance technology I like to call No Baloney™.
Ready? Here's what you really need to know about Canadian mortgage deductibility and Tax Refunds: In Canada, when you borrow money to buy your home, you can't deduct the interest. When you borrow money to make certain investments, you may be able to deduct the interest. There. Now that we've covered all the really important stuff, let's review some of the details. First of all, nothing about buying your personal residence is tax-deductible. You don't get to deduct your mortgage interest, there are no special tricks that have escaped your notice, and you will not be getting "Tax Refunds" from your mortgage payments. Period.
That being said, when you borrow money to make investments which have a reasonable expectation of income, you may be able to deduct the interest on the debt. So if you use your home as collateral when you borrow money to invest, you may be able to deduct that interest expense from your income taxes. You could, therefore, have a mortgage with interest that is partially or entirely tax deductible.
However, it's very important to remember two things: (1) No matter how you twist it, turn it, or wordsmith-manoeuvre-it, the money you borrow to buy your principal residence is not tax-deductible; (2) The only way the interest on your home mortgage can be tax-deductible is if you borrow against the equity you already own in your home, and use that money to investment.
The reason it's so very important to be clear about this issue is that borrowing to buy a home is something that most people must do in order to buy a home, and as long as they can afford their mortgage payment, they're psychologically comfortable doing so. They generally don't worry that their money is at risk. In fact, they feel a sense of security about the equity they are building as they pay the mortgage down. Borrowing to invest, on the other hand, is not something that anyone needs to do, and most people are not psychologically comfortable with it. In order for borrowing to invest to make sense, the average long-term, after-tax return on the underlying investment has to be higher than the after-tax interest rate on the loan.
That invariably means taking on investment risk. And for most people, tolerating investment risk is already sufficiently challenging without the added stress of knowing that those investments were made with borrowed money. Think about the recent gyrations in the stock markets, and consider how using leverage might change your emotional response to the hysteria. Don't get me wrong - I'm not picking on leverage as a concept. Using "other people's money" is an age-old investment strategy, it absolutely has its place as a financial planning strategy, and I've used it myself.
What I am picking on is the packaging of leverage - a strategy that inherently adds risk to investing - as a clever and heretofore overlooked way to get tax benefits on your home mortgage. Let's be No Baloney™ clear: For some people, borrowing money to invest may be an appropriate investment strategy. But borrowing money and investing it because you can get a tax deduction on the interest expense is a ridiculous tax strategy.